Home  ›  Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Children With Downs Syndrome a Systematic Review

Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Children With Downs Syndrome a Systematic Review

Written By Sunday, April 17, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Abstruse

This review evaluated the effects of augmentative and culling communication (AAC) on speech evolution in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD); replicated, updated, and extended the systematic review by Schlosser and Wendt (American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 17:212–230, 2008). Twenty-five single case blueprint articles and three group design articles published between 1975 and May 2020 met inclusion criteria related to participant characteristics, intervention type, pattern, and visual assay of dependent variable outcomes. Overall, AAC resulted in improved speech production; however, speech gains that did occur did not surpass AAC use.

References

*included in the current review; **Also included in Schlosser and Wendt (2008) review

  • AssistiveWare. (2020). Will AAC stop a person from learning to speak? AssistiveWare. https://world wide web.assistiveware.com/learn-aac/roadblock-aac-will-stop-a-person-from-learning-to-speak

  • *Bishop, S. Thou., Moore, J. W., Dart, Eastward. H., Radley, K., Brewer, R., Barker, L-Yard., Quintero, 50., Litten, S., Gilfeather, A., Newborne, B., & Toche, C. (2019). Further investigation of increasing vocalizations of children with autism with a speech-generating device. Periodical of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1–ix. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.554

  • Blischak, D., Lombardino, L., & Dyson, A. (2003). Use of speech-generating devices: In support of natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Advice, 19(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/x.1080/0743461032000056478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • *Boesch, One thousand. C., Wendt, O., Subramanian, A., & Hsu, N. (2013). Comparative efficacy of the picture exchange communication arrangement (pecs) versus a speech communication-generating device: Effects on social-communicative skills and spoken communication development. Augmentative and Culling Advice, 29(three), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.818059

  • Cagliani, R. R., Ayres, Yard. 1000., Whiteside, Eastward., & Ringdahl, J. Eastward. (2017). Picture exchange communication system and filibuster to reinforcement. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 29, 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-017-9564-y.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • *Carbone, V. J., Lewis, L., Sweeney-Kerwin, E. J., Dixon, J., Louden, R., & Quinn, South. (2006). A comparison of two approaches for educational activity VB functions: Full communication vs. vocal-solitary. Periodical of Speech-Language Pathology and Practical Behavior Analysis, i(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/ten.1037/h0100199

  • *Carbone, Five. J., Sweeney-Kerwin, East. J., Attanasio, V., & Kasper, T. (2010). Increasing the vocal responses of children with autism and developmental disabilities using manual sign mand grooming and prompt delay. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(iv), 705–709. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-705

  • Carr, East. G., & Durand, V. One thousand. (1985). Reducing behavior bug through functional advice preparation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1985.xviii-111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities: Autism spectrum disorders signs and symptoms. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/signs.html.

  • Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, Due west. L. (2007). Practical Behavior analysis (second ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar

  • Council for Infrequent Children (2014). CEC standards for evidence-based practices in special education Arlington, VA

  • *Dyches, T. T. (1998). Effects of switch training on the communication of children with autism and severe disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 13(iii), 151–162. https://doi.org/x.1177/108835769801300303

  • Flippin, M., Reszka, S., & Watson, L. R. (2010). Effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) on communication and voice communication for children with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, xix, 178–195. https://doi.org/ten.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Ganz, J. B. (2015). AAC interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: Country of the science and futurity enquiry directions. Augmentative and Alternative Advice, 31(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1047532.

    Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Ganz, J. B., Davis, J. L., Lund, Due east. G., Goodwyn, F. D., & Simpson, R. L. (2012a). Meta-analysis of PECS with individuals with ASD: Investigation of targeted versus not-targeted outcomes, participant characteristics, and implementation phase. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 406–418. https://doi.org/ten.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Ganz, J. B., Earles-Vollrath, T. Fifty., Heath, A. Chiliad., Parker, R. I., Rispoli, One thousand. J., & Duran, J. B. (2012b). A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative advice systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 60–74. https://doi.org/ten.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • *Ganz, J. B., Heath, A. Thou., Rispoli, M. J., & Earles-Vollrath, T. L. (2010a). Impact of AAC versus verbal modeling on verbal false, flick discrimination, and related speech: A pilot investigation. Periodical of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22, 179–196. https://doi.org/x.1007/s10882-009-9176-ii.

  • *Ganz, J. B., Lashley, E., & Rispoli, M. J. (2010b). Non-responsiveness to intervention: Children with autism spectrum disorders who practice not rapidly respond to communication interventions. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13(6), 399–407. https://doi.org/ten.3109/17518423.2010.508298.

  • Ganz, J. B., Mason, R. A., Goodwyn, F. D., Boles, M. B., Heath, A. Thousand., & Davis, J. Fifty. (2014). Interaction of participant characteristics and type of AAC with individuals with ASD: A meta-analysis. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 119(vi), 516–535. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-119.half dozen.516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • *Ganz, J. B., Parker, R., & Benson, J. (2009). Bear on of the Pic Substitution Communication System: Effects on communication and collateral effects on maladaptive behaviors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(4), 250–261. https://doi.org/ten.3109/07434610903381111

  • *Ganz, J. B., & Simpson, R. L. (2004). Effects on communicative requesting and spoken communication development of the Film Exchange Communication Organization in children with characteristics of autism. Periodical of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(iv), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000037416.59095.d7

  • **Ganz, J. B., Simpson, R. L., & Corbin-Newsome, J. (2008). The touch of the Picture Commutation Communication Arrangement on requesting and voice communication development in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders and like characteristics. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 157–169. https://doi.org/x.1016/j.rasd.2007.04.005

  • Gevarter, C., & Horan, Chiliad. (2019). A behavioral intervention bundle to increase vocalizations of individuals with autism during voice communication-generating device intervention. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28(ane), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9300-iv.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • *Gevarter, C., O'Reilly, M. F., Kuhn, M., Mills, M., Ferguson, R., Watkins, L., Sigafoos, J., Lang, R., Rojeski, Fifty., & Lancioni, G. E. (2016). Increasing the vocalizations of individuals with autism during intervention with a speech communication-generating device. Periodical of Applied Beliefs Assay, 49(one), 17–33. https://doi.org/ten.1002/jaba.270

  • *Gordon, G., Pasco, Thousand., McElduff, F., Wade, A., Howlin, P., & Charman, T. (2011). A communication-based intervention for nonverbal children with autism: What changes? Who benefits? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(iv), 447–457. https://doi.org/x.1037/a0024379

  • *Greenberg, A. L., Tomaino, G. Due east., Charlop, Thousand. H. (2014). Adapting the Moving picture Exchange Communication System to elicit vocalizations in children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 35–51. https://doi.org/ten.1007/s10882-013-9344-two

  • *Hilton, L. C. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of a Flick Exchange Communication System on increasing manding and song speech in identical twin adults with autism (Publication No. 3708874) [Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan Academy]. ProQuest LLC.

  • *Howlin, P., Gordon, R. K., Pasco, Yard., Wade, A., & Charman, T. (2007). The effectiveness of Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) training for teachers of children with autism: A pragmatic, grouping randomised controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(5), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01707.x

  • *Hu, X., & Lee, G. (2019). Effects of PECS on the emergence of vocal mands and the reduction of aggressive behavior across settings for a kid with autism. Behavioral Disorders, 44(4), 215–226. https://doi.org/x.1177/0198742918806925

  • International Club for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. (2020). What is AAC? https://www.isaac-online.org/english/what-is-aac/

  • *Jurgens, A., Anderson, A., &. Moore, D. Westward. (2009). The effect of pedagogy PECS to a child with autism on verbal behaviour, play, and social operation. Behaviour Change, 26(one), 66–81.

  • *King, Takeguchi, K., Barry, S. Due east., Rehfeldt, R. A., Boyer, V. E., & Mathews, T. L. (2014). Evaluation of the iPad in the acquisition of requesting skills for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1107–1120. https://doi.org/x.1016/j.rasd.2014.05.011

  • Ledford, J. R., Chazin, K. T., Lane, J. D., Zimmerman, G. N., & Ayres, One thousand. A. (2020, September). Single case analysis and review framework (SCARF). Retrieved from: http://ebip.vkcsites.org/scarf2.0

  • Ledford, J. R., Lane, J. D., Zimmerman, Yard. N., Chazin, K. T., & Ayres, 1000. A. (2016, April). Single case analysis and review framework (SCARF). Retrieved from: http://vkc.mc.vanderbilt.edu/ebip/scarf/

  • Ledford, J. R., Lane, J. D., & Gast, D. L. (2018). Dependent variables, measurement, and reliability. In J. R. Ledford (Ed.) & Gast, D. L. (Ed.). Unmarried case inquiry methodology: Applications in special educational activity and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 97–131). Routledge.

  • *Lorah, Eastward. R. (2012). Comparing picture exchange and vocalisation output communication aids in young children with autism (Publishing No. 3510318) [Doctoral dissertation, Temple University]. ProQuest LLC.

  • Millar, D. C., Low-cal, J. C., & Schlosser, R. W. (2006). The affect of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the spoken communication production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A enquiry review. Periodical of Speech, Linguistic communication, and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264. https://doi.org/ten.1044/1092-4388(2006/021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Mirenda, P. (1999). Augmentative and culling communication techniques. Instruction communication skills to students with severe disabilities, 119–138.

  • Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and vocalization output communication aids. Language, Voice communication, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2003/017).

    Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Ringdahl, J. E., Falcomata, T. Due south., Christensen, T. J., Bass-Ringdahl, Southward. Yard., Lentz, A., Dutt, A., & Schuh-Claus, J. (2009). Evaluation of a pretreatment cess to select mand topographies for functional communication training. Research in Developmental Disabilities, thirty(ii), 330–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2008.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Royer, D. J., Lane, K. L., & Mutual, Due east. A. (2017). Group comparing and single-case research design quality indicator matrix using Council for Exceptional Children 2014 standards: Standards overview and walk-through guide. Unpublished tool. Retrieved from http://www.ci3t.org/practice

  • Schlosser, R. W., & Koul, R. Yard. (2015). Speech communication output technologies in interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A scoping review. Augmentative and Culling Communication, 31(4), 285–309. https://doi.org/x.3109/07434618.2015.1063689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Schlosser, R. W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech communication product in children with autism: A systematic review. American Periodical of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • **Schlosser, R. Westward., Sigafoos, J., Luiselli, J. Thousand., Angermeier, K., Harasymowyz, U., Schooley, K., & Belfiore, P. J. (2007). Effects of constructed speech output on requesting and natural speech production in children with autism: A preliminary study. Inquiry in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 139–163. https://doi.org/x.1016/j.rasd.2006.10.001

  • Seattle Children'due south Infirmary Voice communication and Language Services. (2018, March). Frequent questions well-nigh augmentative and culling communication (AAC). Seattle Children'southward Infirmary. https://world wide web.seattlechildrens.org/globalassets/documents/for-patients-and-families/pfe/pe1903.pdf

  • Sigafoos, J. (2000). Communication development and aberrant beliefs in children with developmental disabilities. Education and Preparation in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 35(ii), 168–176.

    Google Scholar

  • *Sigafoos, J., Didden, R., & O'Reilly, G. (2003). Effects of spoken communication output on maintenance of requesting and frequency of vocalizations in three children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, xix, 37–47. https://doi.org/ten.1080/0743461032000056487

  • *Tan, X. Y., Trembath, D., Bloomberg, K. Iacono, T., & Caithness, T. (2014). Acquisition and generalization of primal word signing by 3 children with autism. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17(ii), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2013.863236

  • *Tincani, M. (2003). Effects of selection-based versus topography-based advice preparation on the acquisition of mands by children with autism and multiple disabilities (Publishing No. 3059341) [Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio Land University]. ProQuest LLC.

  • **Tincani, M. (2004). Comparing the Picture Commutation Advice System and sign language training for children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19(3), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576040190030301

  • **Tincani, Yard., Crozier, S., & Alazetta, L. (2006). The Picture show Commutation Communication Organisation: Effects on manding and speech development for schoolhouse-aged children with autism. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41(2), 177–184.

  • Tincani, Yard., & Devis, K. (2011). Quantitative synthesis and component analysis of single-participant studies on the Picture Exchange Communication System. Remedial and Special Education, 32(6), 458–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510362494.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • *Valentino, A. L., Shillingsburg, M. A., Call, N. A., Burton, B., Bowen, C. N. (2011). An investigation of extinction-induced vocalizations. Beliefs Modification, 35(iii), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445511398412

  • van der Meer, L. A. J., & Rispoli, 1000. (2010). Communication interventions involving speech-generating devices for children with autism: A review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, thirteen(4), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518421003671494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • *Wendt, O., Hsu, North., Simon, K., Dienhart, A., & Cain, Fifty. (2019). Effects of an iPad-based voice communication-generating device infused into teaching with the Picture Commutation Advice Arrangement for adolescents and immature adults with severe autism spectrum disorder. Beliefs Modification, 43(vi), 898–932. https://doi.org/x.1177/0145445519870552

  • Wolery, 1000., Busick, M., Reichow, B., & Barton, E. Eastward. (2008). Comparison of overlap methods for quantitatively synthesizing unmarried-subject data. The Journal of Special Education, 44(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/x.1177/0022466908328009.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • **Yoder, P. & Stone, West. 50. (2006). A randomized comparison of the result of two prelinguistic communication interventions on the acquisition of spoken communication in preschoolers with ASD. Journal of Speech, Linguistic communication, and Hearing Research, 49, 698–711. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/051)

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Section of Communication Sciences and Special Education, Eye for Autism and Behavioral Education Research, University of Georgia, 110 Carlton St, Athens, GA, 30606, Us

    Emily N. White, Kevin M. Ayres, Sara Chiliad. Snyder & Rachel R. Cagliani

  2. Department of Special Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

    Jennifer R. Ledford

Contributions

KMA, RRC, and ENW contributed to the idea for the review and contributed to developing initial search procedures. ENW performed the literature search and data analysis with secondary coding existence completed by SKS. ENW completed the initial draft of the manuscript with preparation and editing completed by SKS and KMA. JRL and RRC assisted in revising and improving the manuscript. All authors read and approved the terminal manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily N. White.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We take no known disharmonize of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

White, Eastward.N., Ayres, 1000.M., Snyder, S.Grand. et al. Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Voice communication Product for Individuals with ASD: A Systematic Review. J Autism Dev Disord 51, 4199–4212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04868-two

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI : https://doi.org/ten.1007/s10803-021-04868-2

Keywords

  • Augmentative and alternative communication
  • Speech product
  • Autism spectrum disorder

lawsonideven38.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10803-021-04868-2

0 Response to "Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Children With Downs Syndrome a Systematic Review"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel